State ex rel. Strothers v. Wertheim
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Today we are again called upon to decide what constitutes a “public office” and what records are “public records” for purposes of the Public Records Act. The Citizens of Cuyahoga County Ombudsman Office is a private, *156nonprofit corporation, supported by public funds, established for the purpose of assisting the citizens of Cuyahoga County in resolving complaints against agencies of the county government. The primary issue in this case is whether the Ombudsman Office is a “public office” as defined by R.C. 149.011(A) and thereby subject to the public records disclosure requirements of R.C.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. University of Toledo FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Fostoria Daily Review Co. v. Fostoria Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. TelbLucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1990
3Cited by54 opinions
- Officer Melissa Kallstrom v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- O'Toole v. DenihanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Kish v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Rogers v. Dep't of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. BondOhio Supreme Court · 2002
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.