Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Meyer v. Community College of Beaver County

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 2011No. 1141 C.D. 2008Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION by

Judge McCullough.

I concur in the result reached by the Majority. I agree that the Community College of Beaver County (College), as a legal entity, falls within the definition of “person” set forth at section 2(2) of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (CPL)1 and is subject to private actions brought under section 9.2 of the CPL.21 also agree with the Majority’s conclusion that the claims set forth in the complaint sound in contract, rather than tort. However, I respectfully diverge from the focus of the Majority’s analysis.

The instant action was filed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. Sun Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. HOFFMAN v. PITTSBURGHSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pappert v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Northampton County Area Community College v. Dow Chemical, U.S.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Samilo v. PA. INSURANCE DEPT.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API