Legal Opinion
A & P Brush Mfg. Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 6, 1998No. Docket Nos. 97-4117, 97-4171PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
A & P Diversified Technologies, Inc. (“Diversified”) petitions for review of a March 1997 order of the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”), 323 NLRB No. 44,1997 WL 148696 (1997), modifying and affirming a decision and order issued by Administrative Law Judge Steven Davis. The Board found Diversified to be the alter ego of A & P Brush Manufacturing Corp. (“Brush”) and, therefore, in violation of Sections 8(a)(5) and 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(5), (a)(1), for failing to honor Brush’s collective bargaining…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Southport Petroleum Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- National Labor Relations Board v. Rapid Bindery, Inc., and Frontier Bindery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Goodman Piping Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. Omnitest Inspection Services, Inc., Amspec Technical Services, a Partnership, and Amspec Technical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- A & P Brush Mfg. Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998