Legal Opinion

A & P Brush Mfg. Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 6, 1998No. 97-4117Published

1Opinion of the Court

140 F.3d 216

157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2980, 135 Lab.Cas. P 10,146

A & P BRUSH MFG. CORP. and its Alter Ego A & P Diversified

Technologies, Inc., Petitioner/Cross-Respondent,

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.

Docket Nos. 97-4117, 97-4171.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 8, 1998.

Decided April 6, 1998.

Leon Segen, New York City, for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent.

Leslie Randolph, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC (Peter Winkler, Supervisory Attorney, Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Southport Petroleum Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Rapid Bindery, Inc., and Frontier Bindery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Goodman Piping Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Omnitest Inspection Services, Inc., Amspec Technical Services, a Partnership, and Amspec Technical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API