Louisville N. R. Co. v. Ray

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Siler —

Affirming.

Claude Ray, appellee, having recovered a judgment against Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, appellant, for $875 for fire loss alleged to have been started by a locomotive of the company, the latter now brings us this appeal.

Appellant says that the judgment should be reversed because the following prejudicial errors were committed on this trial, yiz., (A) peremptory instruction for the company was refused; (B) amended petition for Ray was permitted to be filed; (C) erroneous instructions to the jury were given.

A. On the question of the…