Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Lausberg

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 2, 1914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas, Third Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William: Rogers Clay, Commissioner

— Affirming.

In this action for damages for injury to Ms property, alleged to have resulted from a change of grade and from the negligent prosecution of the work of construction, plaintiff,'Frank H. Lausberg, recovered a verdict and judgment against the defendant, City of Louisville, for the sum of $500. The city appeals.

Briefly stated, the facts are as follows:

Several years ago the Caperton heirs owned a tract of land which they divided into lots, streets and alleys. One of the streets was named Underhill street. This street was a dirt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Greer v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885
  2. City of Owensboro v. HopeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Philpot v. Town of TompkinsvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. City of Louisville v. SauterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Foxwell v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. City of Hazard v. EversoleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. North Jellico Coal Co. v. HeltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. Pursiful v. City of HarlanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. DunganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API