State v. Parks
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
We note at the outset that defendant failed to discuss his second, third, sixth, and eleventh assignments of error in the brief. These assignments of error are therefore deemed abandoned. N.C. R. App. P., Rule 28. We further note that defendant’s discussion contained in part C, sections 3-4, of his first argument is directed to matters not properly preserved under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1446 and N.C. R. App. P., Rule 10. Therefore, we do not consider it. Defendant consolidates his remaining assignments of error into three arguments challenging respectively the court’s qualifying…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Guyther v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. HaddockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. JarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Cap Care Group, Inc. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- NationsBank of North Carolina, N.A. v. American Doubloon Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.