Legal Opinion
Parker v. Bath Iron Works Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 15, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
Jere Parker appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying his petition for restoration of benefits. The issue on appeal is whether an employer that voluntarily dismisses a petition for review must restore benefits that were suspended during the pendency of that petition and while the employee was absent from the state for purposes other than to return to a permanent place of residence. See 39 M.R.S.A. § 100(4)(B)(1) (1989), repealed by P.L.1991, ch. 615, §§ D-21, D-26 (effective October 17, 1991), codified as 39 M.R.S.A. § 100(4r-A)(F) (Supp.1991). 1…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Davis v. Scott Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Leo v. AMERICAN HOST & DERRICK COMPANYSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Bouford v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Stockford v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Guaranty Fund Management Services v. Workers' Compensation BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Community Telecommunications Corp. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Lucas v. E.A. Buschmann, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Dorr v. Maine Maritime AcademySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Edwards v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.