Legal Opinion

Marquart v. Clark

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 26, 1942No. 14,797PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke

Clark, defendant in error, who was plaintiff below, brought suit and had judgment against plaintiffs in error, defendants below, on a promissory note. The principal defenses pleaded were lack of consideration and duress. At the close of the evidence the court sustained a motion interposed by defendant in error for a directed verdict and entered judgment on the verdict. Reversal is sought on a writ of error. Reference will be made to the parties as they appeared below, or by name.

According to plaintiff’s testimony, the note in suit ($1,421.11 face amount, and hereinafter mentioned as Exhibit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tisdel v. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  2. McClair v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Neal v. Wilson County BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Schwalb v. RielSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wiesen v. ShortColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Columbus Automotive Corp. v. Oldberg Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1967
  3. Romola v. Dennis, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API