Legal Opinion

Baker v. City of South St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1938No. 31,596PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

We granted a new trial on the former appeal, Baker v. City of South St. Paul, 198 Minn. 437, 270 N. W. 154, upon the grounds that, although a city is liable for a defect in a street after it has actual or constructive notice of the defect a sufficient length of time to render it negligent in failing to remove the defect or otherwise protect the public against it, plaintiff failed to prove that the defendant had knowledge or notice of the defect. The facts are stated at length in the opinion on the former appeal. There plaintiff claimed that two holes were made in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baker v. City of South St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McNab v. JeppesenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Jackson v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Roche v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API