Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Hudson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court. Seminole County ; Geo. O. Crump., Judge. Action by Hugh Hudson against the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action for damages for personal injuries, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below. Hereafter, for convenience, the parties will be designated ‘‘plaintiff” and “.defendant,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff was employed by the defendant asi a pumper at its pumphouse at Maud, in Pottawatomie county, ait 'the time the injuriéis .complained of occurred. He alleges that during the course of his employment he found that a pinion of the engine bad slipped from its proper position at the bull…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boldt v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Grady v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Farris v. Receivers of Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Simpson v. Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whitehead Coal Mining Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Wichita Falls & S. R. v. LindleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Narragansett Pier Railroad v. PalmerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1944
- Wright v. KemperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Brackville ex rel. Brackville v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.