Legal Opinion

Grown v. City of Cleverland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1932No. 23502PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The particular sections of the Municipal Code which are in question here are 821-1, 821-2, 821-6, 821-7, 821-8 and 821-12, which read as follows:

Section 821-1. “Definition. The term ‘corn sugar’ as used in this ordinance, shall be construed as any monosaccharide or mixture of monosaccharides, derived from grain or vegetable substances, sold in the dry state, and shall include compounds known as invert or brewer’s sugar.”

Section 821-2. “In addition to other licenses, if any, required by law or ordinances, any person, firm or corporation engaged or intending to engage in the business of buying…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Holsman v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. City of St. Joseph v. LevinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Launder v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. City of Kansas v. GarnierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. S.C. S.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State ex rel. Clark v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp. v. BarberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954
  4. Pierstorff v. Board of Embalmers & Funeral DirectorsOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. In Re Order of BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API