Lancaster v. Sexton
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.
(after stating the facts as above). The contention first presented, to wit, that the trial court erred when he refused to sustain appellants’ plea setting up certain facts which they thought entitled them to have the suit abated, is overruled. The facts referred to were substantially the same as those set up in appellants’ petition in their suit to set aside the order of the county court of Harrison county appointing Mrs. Fannie Dunn temporary administratrix of the estate of her husband, appellee’s intestate, and to set aside the order of said county court appointing appellee permanent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Lancaster Wallace v. SextonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Kenyon v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Pennsylvania R. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
3Cited by1 opinion
- Producers & Refiners Corp. v. CastileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926