Grimes v. Crockrom

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Douglas Grimes appeals the trial court’s denial of his Verified Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum in this medical malpractice action. Grimes presents a single issue for our review, namely, whether the trial court erred when it denied his motion and ordered him to produce medical records to Victoria Crockrom without also providing for security for the payment of attorney’s fees Crockrom owes Grimes.

We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions. 1

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In May 2007, Crockrom retained the services of Grimes, an…