Legal Opinion
Foor v. Huntington National Bank
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1986No. 85AP-167PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas overruling a motion of appellant, Donald Lynn Billman, to quash a subpoena duces tecum issued against him by plaintiff-appellee, Roberta Jean Foor, requiring Billman, an attorney, to produce papers in his possession relating to his former representation of plaintiff prior to institution of the present action by her.
Billman is not a party to this case but, instead, is a witness against whom a subpoena duces tecum was issued upon plaintiff’s request requiring Billman to appear and to bring with him:
“All records in your…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Dunn v. Hudson River Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Mancino v. City of LakewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Fire Protection Resources, Inc. v. Johnson Fire Protection Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Wozniak v. TonidandelOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bennett v. NSR, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.