Faris v. Lampson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County. The facts are stated, in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
— In this case no oral argument was had, nor did the appellants file any points or authorities; and having thus omitted to point out the errors of which they complain, the judgment should be affirmed without an examination of the record. (Mokelumne H. C. M. Co. v. Woodbury, 10 Cal. 188; Edmondson v. Alameda Co., 24 Cal. 350; Holm v. Roach, 25 Cal. 37; Hickinbotham v. Monroe, 28 Cal. 489; Brewster v. Johnson, 51 Cal. 222; Estate of Montgomery, 59 Cal. 583.)
Belcher, C. C., and Hayne, C., concurred. The Court.
— For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex parte BurrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Brewster v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Hickinbotham v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Holm v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- In re the Estate of MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peek v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888