Hickinbotham v. Monroe
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fifth Judicial District, San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Sawyer, J.
The time for filing briefs having expired three months ago, and none having been filed, and there being no points on file,, as required by rule seventeen, the judgment is affirmed, on the authority of Edmondson v. Alameda County, 24 Cal, 349, and Hutton v. Reed, 25 Cal. 488. A like disposition will be made of all cases similarly situated, when taken up for decision in their proper order.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hutton v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by4 opinions
- Faris v. LampsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Peek v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Tucker v. ConstableOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Drexler v. Seal Rock Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1889