Vollmer v. City of Memphis
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MATHERNE, Special Justice.
In each of these cases, consolidated for trial and on appeal, the plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of section 6-51-102, Tennessee Code Annotated, under which statute the Memphis City Council enacted an annexation ordinance which affected the plaintiffs as citizens and property owners. In the alternative, the plaintiffs also brought action in the nature of quo warran-to challenging the reasonableness of the ordinance under section 6-51-103(a), T.C.A.
The chancellor granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, declared section 6-51-102, T.C.A.,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Pirtle v. City of JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Frost v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Nashville v. BrowningTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
- Hobbs v. Lawrence CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hart v. City of Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Vollmer v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Tipton v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- Gerald Largen v. The City Of HarrimanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
- State of Tennessee, ex rel., Darrell L. Tipton, Michael L. Ross, & Dale M. Ross v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006