Legal Opinion

Vollmer v. City of Memphis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1990PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’BRIEN, Justice.

This suit in the nature of a Quo Warran-to proceeding has a long and extensive history. In December 1984 the plaintiffs filed a complaint challenging the validity of an ordinance proposed by the City of Memphis to annex and include within its corporate limits certain adjacent areas, including the town of Cordova, in Shelby County, Tennessee. The constitutional issue raised in the complaint was that the annexing ordinance violated Article 1, § 1 and Article 11, § 16 of the Tennessee Constitution. A motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiffs was granted in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Memphis v. Memphis City BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Vollmer v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Davis v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Witcher v. BilbreyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  2. Wolf v. SundquistCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  3. City of Marion v. Guaranty Loan & Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Estate of Bell v. Shelby County Health Care Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Estate of Bell v. Shelby County Health Care Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API