Legal Opinion

Hart v. City of Johnson City

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1990PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

This case requires this Court to determine the constitutionality of the 1984 amendment to Tenn.Code Ann. § 6-51-103 — the statute authorizing suits to contest municipal annexations. The amendment permits property owners adjacent to property annexed by municipal ordinance to bring a quo warranto action contesting the reasonableness of the annexation. However, by population classification it excludes adjacent property owners in 81 of 95 Tennessee counties from the amendment’s provisions.

The plaintiffs insist that the population classifications set out in the 1984…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Estrin v. MossTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Darnell v. ShapardTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. City of Chattanooga v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Stalcup v. City of GatlinburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Pirtle v. City of JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. TesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Earhart v. City of BristolTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. BoydCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Tipton v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. American Chariot v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API