Turnbull v. Township of Alpena
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Alpena. (Kelley, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Plaintiff brought this action of assumpsit against the defendant township to recover certain moneys claimed to have been paid by him as taxes under protest. The tax was paid February 34, 1888, to release his property from a claimed levy made by the treasurer of defendant under the authority of a warrant attached to his tax roll for the year 1887.
Upon the trial plaintiff claimed as one ground of recovery that the personal property, consisting of pine logs and cedar posts and ties, assessed to him upon said roll at a valuation of $17,000, was not legally assessable in defendant township at all,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Elliott v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Doran v. Phillips ex rel. Village of Mount MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Sawyer-Goodman Co. v. Township of Crystal FallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by8 opinions
- Michigan Sanitarium & Benevolent Ass'n v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Fisher-New Center Co. v. DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Minor Lumber Co. v. City of AlpenaMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Moore v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.