Legal Opinion

Minor Lumber Co. v. City of Alpena

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Alpena. (Kelley, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiff brought an action on the common counts to recover back certain taxes paid under protest. The claim was for the recovery of State, county, and city taxes. The court below directed a verdict for plaintiff for the city taxes, and refused to permit a recovery for the State and county taxes paid. Defendant appeals.

- The only ground upon which the court below directed a verdict for the repayment of the city taxes was that the warrant for their collection in the hands of the city treasurer had expired at the time he threatened to make the levy, and that, having at that time no right to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Township of New BuffaloMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Turnbull v. Township of AlpenaMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fisher-New Center Co. v. DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Ranney Refrigerator Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Matrau v. TompkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Godkin v. Township of DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Long v. Village of DundeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API