Legal Opinion

Moore v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Mandamus by John R. Moore to compel Roscoe D. Dix, auditor general, to issue a tax deed.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding to compel the respondent to issue state deeds to relator for the lands described in the petition, which lands, it is claimed, were held as state tax lands, and were subject to sale as such at the time of the application of relator hereinafter mentioned. It appears that in December, 1898, relator wrote a letter to the auditor general, inclosing $500, and asking for the amount necessary to pay to purchase the lands mentioned. Some correspondence took place between the relator and respondent upon this subject, in the course of which the relator was informed that it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hughes v. JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Elliott v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Mumford v. ArmstrongNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  4. Hubbard v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Turnbull v. Township of AlpenaMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pfeiffer v. NormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Board of Supervisors v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Moritz v. NicholsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Labrier v. LeedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. C. N. Ray Corporation v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API