Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Dean

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1939No. 12682PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

Under the evidence introduced, including the positively verified petition, the judge did not abuse his discretion in granting a'n interlocutory injunction. Sapp v. Ritch, 169 Ga. 33 (3) (149 S. E. 636) ; Volunteer State Life Ins. Co. v. Chapman, 173 Ga. 633 (160 S. E. 783) ; Roberts v. Roberts, 180 Ga. 671 (3) (180 S. E. 491) ; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Gunn, 185 Ga. 108 (4) (194 S. E. 365) ; Simon v. Simon. 185 Ga. 385 (195 S. E. 430). Judgment atffvnned.

All the Justices conour.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. GunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Sapp v. RitchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  4. Volunteer State Life Insurance v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Simon v. SimonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Leger v. Ken Edwards Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1967