Legal Opinion

Pico v. State

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 10, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FURMAN, P.J.A.D.

In granting summary judgment for defendants State of New Jersey and Township of Wayne, the trial court invoked the bar of weather immunity under the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:4-7:

Neither a public entity nor a public employee is liable for an injury caused solely by the effect on the use of streets and highways of weather conditions.

Plaintiff’s claim against defendant Waller was settled. She is not pursuing an appeal from summary judgment for defendant County of Passaic, which was based upon no county juris*449diction over Route 23, a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Bergen v. KOPPENALSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  3. Malloy v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Wuethrich v. DeliaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Meta v. TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL AND COUNTY OF CAMDENNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pico v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Bland v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bland v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Pico v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. Pico v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API