Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bland v. Davison County

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1993No. 18002Published

1ConcurrenceWuest, Justice

The County has liability insurance, therefore, sovereign immunity is not applicable in this case since SDCL ch. 21-32A has eliminated sovereign immunity to the extent liability insurance coverage exists. Nor is it an “out of repair” case sanctioned by SDCL 31-32-10. Rather, this case falls within the provisions of SDCL 31-12-19 because in purchasing liability insurance, the County has waived sovereign immunity. While SDCL 31-12-19 does not set forth every specific procedure a county must use to maintain the highways, it does impose a mandatory duty to “maintain properly and adequately the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Koehler v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Pico v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  4. Fincher v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API