Legal Opinion
Meta v. TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL AND COUNTY OF CAMDEN
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 11, 1977PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
152 N.J. Super. 228 (1977)
377 A.2d 934
ALEXANDRIA META, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL AND COUNTY OF CAMDEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 6, 1977.
Decided August 11, 1977.
Before Judges FRITZ, ARD and PRESSLER.
Mr. William R. Hopkin, Jr. argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Tomlin and Tomlin, attorneys; Mr. David C. Harrison on the brief).
Mr. Neil F. Deighan, Jr., argued the cause for respondent Township of Cherry Hill (Messrs. Kisselman, Deighan, Montano & Summers, attorneys).
Mr. John L. Slimm argued the cause for…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Amelchenko v. Borough of FreeholdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Bergen v. KOPPENALSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Hoy v. CapelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
3Cited by29 opinions
- Rochinsky v. State of NJ, Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- In Re Opinion No. 415, New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional EthicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Pico v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Bland v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Manna v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.