Legal Opinion

Application of Kurt Baum

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 22, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7787PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection on prior art of claims 1, 3, 6 and 7 of appellant’s reissue application1 for “Recovery of Combustible Gases in Ferro-Metallurgical Processes.” Claims 4 and 5 were allowed by the examiner. The board reversed the examiner’s rejection of claim 2.

Appellant’s specification states, in material substance, that in metallurgical processes wherein ferrous metal is refined in a converter by being contacted at high temperatures with an oxygen-containing gas stream, the object of the present invention is to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Application of Douglas H. MoretonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Application of Harold E. KalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradium Techs. LLC v. Andrei IANCUCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  2. Esso Research & Engineering Co. v. Kahn & Company, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
  3. In re AslanianCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  4. Application of Kurt BaumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API