Application of Douglas H. Moreton
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the affirmance by the Patent Office Board of Appeals of the rejection of claims 2, 3, 8, 9, 13, and 14 of application Ser. 333,605, filed January 27, 1953, entitled “Method of Hydraulic Power Transmission and Lubrication.” At the argument appellant’s counsel withdrew claims 2, 3, and 13. The rejection is based on two references:
Caprio 2,245,649 June 17,1941
French
Patent 856,487 Mar. 23, 1940
The first question before us is, what did the appellant invent? We next have to determine whether that invention is patentable in view of the prior art. We turn to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re CrossCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- In re EitzenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- In re CrowleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
3Cited by24 opinions
- Application of Arthur v. HughesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Barr Rubber Products Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Application of Warren R. AttwoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Alford G. Farnham, Francis N. Apel and Howard L. BenderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Harold E. KalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.