Legal Opinion

Mayhood v. Mitchell La Rosa

California Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1962No. S. F. 21028PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to 47 acres of land against Nanette La Rosa, the granddaughter and sole devisee of Hattie Mayhood, and against the personal representative of Mrs. Mayhood’s estate. Plaintiff acquired the land before his marriage to Mrs. Mayhood in 1915. Mrs. Mayhood died in 1959. During the 44 years of the marriage, the land was used to grow fruit trees and grape vines. Until he became incapacitated by illness in 1957, plain tiff devoted most of his working time and energy to managing and cultivating the orchard and vineyard. All receipts therefrom were placed in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PepperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Murry v. ManleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Dini v. DiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. MyersIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. California School Employees Ass'n v. Sunnyvale Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Devenyns v. HartigColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Keen v. PrisinzanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Bunnell v. Superior Court of Alameda Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API