Legal Opinion

Cromeans v. Morgan Keegan & Co.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided December 1, 2014No. 2:12-CV-04269-NKLPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, District Judge.

The Court previously granted partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant *936Armstrong Teasdale, LLP on Plaintiff John Cromeans’ claims for legal malpractice and negligent misrepresentation. See [Docs. 93 and 170]. Cromeans filed a motion to vacate the order [Docs. 455 and 545] which the Court denied. Upon further consideration, the Court grants the motion to vacate, in part. It finds that summary judgment should be granted on the malpractice claims, but should not be granted on Cromeans’ negligent misrepresentation claim.

I. Discussion

A. Legal…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Banco Popular North America v. GandiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. F.E. Appling InterestsTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Martin Frank, and Nylo-Thane Plastics Corp., Maurice Minuto, Olanda Minuto, Louis Braunston, Leonard FreedmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. Azrielli v. Cohen Law OfficesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Petrillo v. BachenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Church Mutual Insurance v. Alliance Adjustment GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Brown v. Adams and Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  3. Drew v. Lance Camper MFG. CORP.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API