In re Deng
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, J.
In these child protective proceedings under the juvenile code, MCL 712A.1 et seq., respondent appeals by leave granted a dispositional order requiring that respondent’s children receive physician-recommended vaccinations. Because the trial court has the authority to make medical decisions over a respondent’s objections to vaccination for children under its jurisdiction and the court did not clearly err by determining that vaccination was appropriate for the welfare of respondent’s children and society, we affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Respondent and her husband have four children…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Elianah T.-T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- In Re Elianah T.-T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- In re PilandMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- in Re Foust MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- in Re Statler MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021