Legal Opinion

In re Deng

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 2016No. Docket No. 328826PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, J.

In these child protective proceedings under the juvenile code, MCL 712A.1 et seq., respondent appeals by leave granted a dispositional order requiring that respondent’s children receive physician-recommended vaccinations. Because the trial court has the authority to make medical decisions over a respondent’s objections to vaccination for children under its jurisdiction and the court did not clearly err by determining that vaccination was appropriate for the welfare of respondent’s children and society, we affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Respondent and her husband have four children…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Elianah T.-T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  2. In Re Elianah T.-T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  3. In re PilandMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. in Re Foust MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. in Re Statler MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API