Legal Opinion

Germ v. Price

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1954No. Appeal, 123PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Weight, J.,

On November 5, 1953, in a trespass action before a magistrate, Ludwig Germ obtained a judgment against Bernard Price. On November 23, Price filed an appeal in the Municipal Court. On December 15, Germ caused the appeal to be stricken from the record because of Price’s failure to comply with Rule 9 of the said court. This Rule provides that “An appeal taken from the judgment of a magistrate shall not be perfected unless the party filing same shall, within 21 days thereafter, file proof that he has given notice personally or by registered mail to the adverse party, stating…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McFadden v. Pennzoil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Newman v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Commonwealth v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Smith v. Ellwood City Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Babis v. New York Extract Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Caples v. KlugmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Wargo v. WargoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Saturen v. Gibraltar Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Cusamano v. Vested Gentry, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API