Legal Opinion

Newman v. Globe Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeal, No. 148PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania awarded to Woy Brothers a contract for the construction of a highway, and the Globe Indemnity Company became their surety for the faithful performance of the work. Certain machinery, the subject of the present action of replevin, was thereafter purchased by the contractors, and a part of the consideration paid. On March 9, 1920, there remained due the sum of $2,073. Negotiations to secure funds to satisfy the balance of the claim were entered into with Newman, plaintiff here, and culminated in the *376purchase of the property in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. White v. GunnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Power v. GroganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Trustees of Methodist Episcopal Church of Franklin v. Equitable Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Collins's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  5. Yerkes v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Leitch v. Sanford Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. McFadden v. Pennzoil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Richter v. MozenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Taplinger v. Northwestern Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. National Bank of Germantown & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API