State v. Meckelson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 A criminal defendant receives constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel where no legitimate strategic or tactical explanation can be found for a particular trial decision. State v. Rainey, 107 Wn. App. 129, 135-36, 28 P.3d 10 (2001) (citing State v. McFarland, 127 Wn.2d 322, 336, 899 P.2d 1251 (1995)). Failure to bring a plausible motion to suppress potentially unlawfully obtained evidence is one such decision. Rainey, 107 Wn. App. *434at 136. David Lloyd, Meckelson’s defense lawyer, failed to pursue a plausible challenge to the lawfulness of a traffic stop that led to Mr. Meckelson’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Montes-MalindasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. Montes-MalindasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.