Legal Opinion

State v. Meckelson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 6, 2006No. 23868-7-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 A criminal defendant receives constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel where no legitimate strategic or tactical explanation can be found for a particular trial decision. State v. Rainey, 107 Wn. App. 129, 135-36, 28 P.3d 10 (2001) (citing State v. McFarland, 127 Wn.2d 322, 336, 899 P.2d 1251 (1995)). Failure to bring a plausible motion to suppress potentially unlawfully obtained evidence is one such decision. Rainey, 107 Wn. App. *434at 136. David Lloyd, Meckelson’s defense lawyer, failed to pursue a plausible challenge to the lawfulness of a traffic stop that led to Mr. Meckelson’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Montes-MalindasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. Montes-MalindasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API