Legal Opinion

In Re Smith

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided November 21, 2000No. 1:00-cr-00031PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline matter, we must decide whether the membership of David Lee Smith, Esquire (“Smith”), in the bar of this court should be revoked based on his disbarment by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Having conducted intrinsic review of the pertinent underlying records, considered the factors adopted in Selling v. Radford, 243 U.S. 46, 37 S.Ct. 377, 61 L.Ed. 585 (1917), and heard oral argument, we revoke Smith’s membership.

I

The background facts and procedural history of this matter are set out in the opinion of the en banc court, see In re Smith, 100…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Perreira v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
  5. Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Price v. Lehtinen (In Re Lehtinen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. In Re MoncierDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2008
  3. In re ThavDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  4. In Re McTigheDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
  5. In Re BellDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API