Legal Opinion

In Re Moncier

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided April 29, 2008No. 1:08-cr-00009PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

CURTIS L. COLLIER, Chief Judge.

One of the lesser-known responsibilities placed upon the federal courts is the task of admitting attorneys to practice before them and, when necessary, disciplining those attorneys. Each federal court must regulate the requirements and procedures for admission; the requirements and standards for attorneys already practicing before the court; and the procedures and determinations for those attorneys who fail to adhere to the standards of that federal court. These are among the administrative or management responsibilities of the court.

The…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Herbert S. Moncier v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY v. Larry Edward PARRISHTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  3. R. Sadler Bailey v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Moncier v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011
  5. In Re: Herbert Moncier v.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API