Legal Opinion
Hughes & Hatcher, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 17, 1968No. Nos. 17412, 17517PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Chief Judge.
These proceedings involve a bitter controversy between two rival labor unions,1 each vying to organize the employees of the employer2 in order to become their bargaining representative.
*560The employer owns and operates a chain of fourteen retail clothing stores in metropolitan Detroit, and thi’ough its subsidiary, Oppenheim’s, operates two stores in Jackson, Michigan. It employs in all of the stores about eleven hundred employees, three hundred of whom were already represented by a union other than the two here involved.
Organizational activity was initiated by Amalgamated in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- International Association of MacHinists Tool and Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cannady, D/b/a, Bob White Target Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Cannady, D/b/a, Bob White Target Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Hughes & Hatcher, Inc. And Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary, Oppenheim's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Central States Joint Board, Retail & Department Store Employees, Etc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968