Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Bates

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1898No. 7828PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This was an action upon a promissory note, in which plaintiff below had judgment, and defendant has brought the record here for review.

We are asked to ignore the bill of exceptions on the ground that it was not prepared and served within fifteen days from the final adjournment of the term at which the judgment was obtained, no time, in addition to the statutory period, having been given by the trial court or the judge thereof for the preparation and settlement of the bill. It is true that the draft of the proposed bill was not submitted to plaintiff’s counsel for examination and amendment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Palmer v. Nassau BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Omaha Street Railway Co. v. LoehneisenNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Citizens National Bank of Tacoma v. WintlerWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Nash v. CostelloNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. StoddartIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Manley State Bank v. SpanglerNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  3. First National Bank v. GrignonIdaho Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API