Legal Opinion

Omaha Street Railway Co. v. Loehneisen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1894No. 5361PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from tbe district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Davis, J. The opinion contains a statement of the case. The public has demanded rapid transit. A higher degree of care is required of the public than under the horse car system. (Carson v. Federal Street & Pleasant Valley R. Co., 15 L. R. A. (Pa.), 257, and cases cited.) Passengers and traveling public are bound to look out for approaching trains when crossing an electric street car track.

Read the full summary

Error from tbe district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Davis, J. The opinion contains a statement of the case. The public has demanded rapid transit. A higher degree of care is required of the public than under the horse car system. (Carson v. Federal Street & Pleasant Valley R. Co., 15 L. R. A. (Pa.), 257, and cases cited.) Passengers and traveling public are bound to look out for approaching trains when crossing an electric street car track. (Thomas v. Citizens Passenger R. Co., 132 Pa. St., 504; Ehrisman v. East Harrisburg City Passenger R. Co., 24 Atl. Rep. [Pa.], 596; Ward…

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, O.

The defendant in error, as administratrix of the estate of Carl Loehneisen, deceased, brought this action under chapter 21 of the Compiled Statutes, alleging negligence on the part of the street railway company, causing the death of her intestate. The errors assigned relate to the giving and refusal of instructions, and for the purpose of considering these errors we adopt the statement of facts made in the brief of the plaintiff in error. "VVe have, however, somewhat abridged that statement. Loehneisen was forty-seven years of age, and employed as a laborer near South Omaha. On the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. MetcalfNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Wallenburg v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Tyler v. HooverNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Schwanenfeldt v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Dore v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API