Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Southern Ry. Co.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided March 16, 1934No. 180-DPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff began this suit by p-raseipe and declaration on July 30, 1930. Thereupon summons issued, returnable to the September term, 1930, held in Danville on the first Monday of September. For some reason not appearing in the record, the summons was not delivered to the marshal until August 29, 1930. The then marshal returned it unexecuted, saying that it was received in the marshal’s office August 29,1930, too late for service for the September term. Thereafter no summons was issued until on the 20th day of January, 1934, at the request of counsel for plaintiff,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Linn & Lane Timber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Fish v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Bell v. Wabash Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Osbourne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Claim of Ahern v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Brooks v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Barger v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API