Legal Opinion
Gold v. Casserly Landscape, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 9, 1993No. A8709-05777; CA A74868PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Safeco Insurance Company of America (Safeco) appeals from a judgment in this garnishment proceeding that held that its insured, defendant Casserly Landscape, Inc. (CLI), is covered under a “non-owned vehicle” endorsement to its general liability policy. Safeco assigns error to the trial court’s ruling that CLI had not borrowed the pickup truck in question at the time of the accident. We affirm.
This is the second appeal in this case. The facts are adequately stated in our prior opinions. Gold v. Casserly Landscape, Inc., 104 Or App 313, 801 P2d 844 (1990), mod 107 Or App 441, 812 P2d 33, rev…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Lane Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Federated Rural Electric InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Gold v. Casserly Landscape, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Gold v. Casserly Landscape, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Headley v. United Fidelity Hospital Assurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ACUITY v. Extreme Lawns, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Thompson v. Estate of Adrian L. PannellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Thompson v. Estate of Adrian L. PannellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001