Thompson v. Estate of Adrian L. Pannell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1ConcurrenceArmstrong, J.
I concur in the majority’s decision to affirm the trial court judgment. I write separately, however, because I cannot join in the majority’s decision to decide this case on the basis of a statute that does not apply to it.
The majority resolves whether plaintiff can recover uninsured motorist benefits from defendant by applying ORS 806.130 to her claim for those benefits. It reasons that that statute, if it applies to defendant, would require defendant to provide no more than the $25,000 in uninsured motorist benefits to plaintiff. Because plaintiff already has received $50,000 in those…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. Water Wonderland Improvement DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Huang v. ClaussenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Western Generation Agency v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.