Legal Opinion

State v. Herzog

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1980No. 16441Published

1Opinion of the Court

610 P.2d 1281 (1980)

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Ronald Ray HERZOG, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 16441.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 10, 1980.

D. Gilbert Athay, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

Robert B. Hansen, Atty. Gen., Robert R. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

HALL, Justice:

Defendant appeals his conviction of the offense of rape.[1] His sole contention on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury verdict.

Shortly after midnight on the morning of November 1, 1978, prosecutrix in the present action,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. RomeroUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Johnson AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  5. State v. ReinholdArizona Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API