Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Workmen's Compensation Commission

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided October 29, 1945No. Civil No. 40-1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, Judge

This matter came on for hearing upon appeal of the claimant herein from the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission of Saint Thomas and Saint John denying compensation for the following reasons:

1. No satisfactory evidence that the decedent was called by telephone from the West Indian Company dock.

2. Insufficient evidence to show that the decedent had left his home to go to the dock.

3. Insufficient evidence to show that the decedent had started on his way to work at the dock.

4. That the barge which the decedent was to tend did not in fact go to the dock at any time that day or that…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Donovan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Souza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alphonso Chinnery v. Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Arts-Bermudez v. Commissioner of LaborSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API