Legal Opinion

Stegemann v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 12, 1913No. 962Published

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 28757 (T. D. 32584).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

The collector of customs at the port of New York classified certain carbon battery rods as articles not decorated, composed in chief value of earthy or mineral substances and not specially provided for. The goods wore accordingly assessed for duty at 35 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph 95 of the tariff act of 1909, which reads as follows:

95. Articles and wares composed wholly or in chief value of earthy or mineral substances, not specially provided for in this section, whether susceptible of decoration or not, if not decorated in any manner, thirty-five per centum ad valorem;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dingelstedt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  2. United States v. BeierleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Robertson v. RosenthalSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Garrison, Wright & Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API