Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Banneker Ventures, LLC v. Graham

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 6, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0391PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge

Banneker Ventures, LLC, is a developer that had an exclusive right to negotiate with Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority for the lease and development of certain real property, but failed to reach a final agreement. In this lawsuit, Banneker alleges tortious interference with contract and business expectancy, violation of local and federal antitrust law, and civil conspiracy. Defendants Jim Graham, Joshua Adler, Robb LaKritz, and LaKritz Adler Development, LLC move to dismiss. The motions will be granted.

I. FACTS

The Amended…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Banneker Ventures, LLC v. Jim GrahamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. Banneker Ventures, LLC v. GrahamDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API