Legal Opinion

Schreiber v. Hill

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1939No. Civil No. 4095PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— This appeal comes before us on an agreed statement of facts which is, in substance, as follows: On the 17th of June, 1937, A. D. Stanley and L. Faye Stanley, his wife, hereinafter called defendants, were the holders of the record title to lot 12, block 1, Brentwood Addition to the City of Phoenix. On that date, Harry W. Hill, as receiver of the Inter-mountain Building & Loan Association, a Utah corporation, recovered a judgment against the Stanleys, in the superior court of Maricopa county, for the sum of approximately $282, which judgment was docketed in the office of the clerk of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union Oil Co. v. Norton-Morgan Commercial Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. McClureArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wuicich v. Solomon-Wickersham Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Strahan v. HaynesArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Wilson v. LowryArizona Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. White v. Brown (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Winter v. Glaze (In Re Glaze)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1994
  3. Grand Real Estate, Inc. v. SirignanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Grand Real Estate, Inc. v. SirignanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Ferguson v. RobertsArizona Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API