Legal Opinion

Plankerton v. Continental Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1930No. 27,759PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Defendant appeals from the judgment in the district court.-

Plaintiff, respondent here, is the administrator of the estate of Almira Claywell, deceased. In January, 1927, Almira Claywell was in possession of certain personal property. At that time Elsie Claywell, her daughter-in-law, claiming to own the property, commenced an action in replevin to recover same, or in case return of the property could not be had then to recover its value, alleged to be $1,200. The answer admitted the value. Defendant Continental Casualty Company as surety joined with Elsie Claywell in the replevin…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berthold v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  2. Chase v. WhittenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. McClure v. BruckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. New England Furniture & Carpet Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Schloss v. George E. Lennon, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hobson v. Dempsey Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Wasche v. WascheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API