Legal Opinion

People v. Gilmore

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 30, 1975No. 74-35PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alloy

Defendant Norman Gilmore appeals from a conviction and sentence following a guilty plea to four counts of an information charging burglary and three counts charging forgery. Following plea negotiations, he was sentenced to concurrent terms of not less than 3 years nor more than 9 years. On appeal in this court defendant asserts that the informations charging forgery were insufficient to charge an offense for the reason that the name of the payee was omitted from the purported description of the bank check.

The counts in question described each check by naming the drawer, the maker, the drawee…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. AbramsIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. The People v. MintoIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. The People v. NickolsIllinois Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ToolenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. People v. SprinkleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. People v. HollomanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. In re Marriage of HeadyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. People v. HollomanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API